Cost 231
Hata Model
First generation GSM systems
operate at 900 MHz band. As the demand on the service increased, allocation of
new channels to the service has been provided by assigning 1800 MHz band to the
system. Hence, first system can use Hata Model for prediction since Hata Model
covers frequency range of 100 to 1500 MHz. However, second system cannot. Cost
231 have addressed this problem and a new model which covers frequency range of
1500 MHz to 2000 MHz has been brought forward by Cost 231 [1].
(1)
Cost 231 Hata Model can be written
as follow:
where a(hm) is defined as in equation (2).
(2)
0 dB for medium sized city and suburban centers with
moderate city centers.
Cm=
3 dB for metropolitan centers
Restrictions of the model
are as in table 1.
Parameters
|
Range of Validity
|
Frequency f, MHz |
1500-2000 |
Base Station Effective Height hb, m |
30-200 |
Mobile Antenna Height hm, m |
1-10 |
Distance R, km |
1-20 |
Table 1 Restrictions of the Cost 231 Hata
Model
Application of this model is limited to cases in which base
station antenna is above the rooftops of the adjacent buildings.
Although Modified Hata could
be used in the same ranges above, use of this model is more popular as
representative of Okumura’s curves in given ranges since model is very simple
with respect to Modified Hata Model. A comparison of two models is given in figure
1 taken by using Wireless Simulator Program. In the figure, it is shown that
Cost 231 Hata Model shows similar manner with Modified Hata Model in Urban
area. They have 3 dB differences and one reason for this difference could be
building percentage correction in Modified Hata Model. If used terrain had
different building percentage the difference would be increasing or decreasing
depending on the terrain. However, when study is done for open area and
Suburban area, Modified Hata model deviates much more from Cost 231 Hata Model.
All these results mean that Cost 231 Hata Model agree well with Okumura Curves
in Urban Area.
Terrain Parameters: Average Width: 73.8 m Average Building Height: 17.49m Percentage of Buildings: 37% Study Parameters: Frequency: 1800 MHz, TX Height (hb)=50m Mobile Height (hm)=1.5m TX Gain: 13 dBi City Size: Large Area Type: Modified Hata Path Loss: Open Area Modified Hata Path Loss (1): Suburban Modified Hata Path Loss (2): Urban
Figure 1 Comparison of
Modified Hata and Cost Hata Model
The application of the model is
limited to large and small macro cells, and this model must not be used for
micro cell coverage area prediction.
[1] Blaustein Matha. , “Radio Propagation in Cellular Networks” ,Artech House, Boston-London,1999